Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reasons behind identified outcomes #123

Open
1 task
naregeff opened this issue Nov 1, 2017 · 6 comments
Open
1 task

Reasons behind identified outcomes #123

naregeff opened this issue Nov 1, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@naregeff
Copy link

naregeff commented Nov 1, 2017

Description
As a user, I would like to understand why the system retains a given outcome

Scope of Work

  • =

Story Points

  • [1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40]

Priority

  • Medium

Risk

  • [Low, Medium, High]

Demo requirement

  1. The system displays likeliest outcomes
  2. The user requests to see the reasoning behind the outcome
  3. For each outcome, the system lists the inputs used to achieve it
  4. For each outcome, the system lists the legal reasoning that was applied

Acceptance Criteria

  • The user knows why each decision was taken
  • The user understands the influence of his/her inputs on the outputs
  • The user understands the legal reasoning that was reproduced by the AI

Documentation, files, diagrams, etc. relating to this feature:
N/A

Changes:

  • [Optional]
@arekmano
Copy link
Collaborator

arekmano commented Nov 2, 2017

Is this a duplicate of #14? Both seem to capture the requirement that the system explain itself.

@naregeff
Copy link
Author

naregeff commented Nov 2, 2017

This is broader than #14 (which focuses solely on displaying the precedents used), and better articulated as a user story.

@arekmano
Copy link
Collaborator

arekmano commented Nov 2, 2017

What are the outcomes in the context of this story? Are they predicted outcomes of a judgement (i.e. 500$ punitive damage, 200$ restitutionary damages) or are they avenues of resolution that they system will "recommend" to the user (i.e. you should go to small claims court, you should send a cease and desist letter, etc)?

@naregeff
Copy link
Author

naregeff commented Nov 2, 2017 via email

@arekmano
Copy link
Collaborator

arekmano commented Nov 2, 2017

Further discussions will be needed concerning this story

@arekmano
Copy link
Collaborator

arekmano commented Nov 7, 2017

This paper explains how to achieve trust in model predictions: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04938

Relevant to the story

@arekmano arekmano modified the milestone: Iteration 5 Nov 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants