Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Effect of the 'genomicReads' parameter #22

Open
apcamargo opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

[Question] Effect of the 'genomicReads' parameter #22

apcamargo opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@apcamargo
Copy link

Hey!

I got one question: the pufferfish align command has a --genomicReads parameter, which I assume activates a non-splice alignment mode. However the README says that spliced-alignment is not currently supported.

Should we expect --genomicReads to give the same results as the default parameters for now? Also, does this mean that you plan puffalign to be splice-aware by default in the future?

Thanks!

@fataltes
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @apcamargo ,

Thanks for the question.
As the readme says, currently Puffaligner does not support spliced-alignment.
The flag --genomicReads is mainly put for metagenomic alignments. The only difference it has with the decoy option is as follows:
You specify a list of references where the decoy references follow the main ones. Now in enabling the --genomicReads, in addition to reads that align better to decoy and will be discarded, the reads that align equally good (same score) to decoy and main references will be discarded as well (rather than only reported with the main reference as is in decoy).

Having such an option, in metagenomic analyses, you can have an index over human and microbial sequences all together and listing the human references as decoy to be filtered out. This can replace a two-step pipeline of first filtering the reads that align to (host) human and align the remaining list to a microbial index.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants