Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error with qwt-6.1.5 during install #983

Open
efreeman74 opened this issue Sep 13, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Error with qwt-6.1.5 during install #983

efreeman74 opened this issue Sep 13, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@efreeman74
Copy link

Hello

I am building DREAM3Dsuperbuild and I have an issue that I can into during the install process. The error occurs along building qwt

A snippet of the qwt error is given below
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/qwt.dir/build.make:126: ../DREAM3D_SDK/superbuild/qwt-6.1.5-5.12.8/Stamp/qwt-configure] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:231: CMakeFiles/qwt.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

I have included a standard output of the error as well as a install script that I have used that generated the error.

I'm installing on RHEL 8.4 with gcc-8.4, Python-3.9.7, cmake-3.18

Any suggestions on building qwt?

build_output.txt
install_DREAM3D.txt

@imikejackson
Copy link
Contributor

If you look at the output from the actual superbuild process it will give a path to the Qwt build directory with some log files. Those are the log files that will tell us what went wrong.

Also are you planning on writing C++ filters for DREAM.3D or do you just want to run DREAM.3D? There are prebuilt binaries for Linux that should run on RHEL. There is also an Anaconda distribution of DREAM3D that will allow you to write DREAM.3D filters using python (and any python library you want to use).

@efreeman74
Copy link
Author

efreeman74 commented Sep 14, 2021 via email

@efreeman74
Copy link
Author

efreeman74 commented Sep 14, 2021 via email

@imikejackson
Copy link
Contributor

tar.gz is the way to go. As long as it is compatible with your systems. :-)

The "Ubuntu" version should have worked on any Linux system.

@efreeman74
Copy link
Author

efreeman74 commented Sep 16, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants