Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Time-based driver for ABB #17

Open
evanatherton opened this issue Sep 28, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Feature Request: Time-based driver for ABB #17

evanatherton opened this issue Sep 28, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@evanatherton
Copy link
Member

I export a RAPID and run it on ABB
The speed result is different from the simulation result from Mimic
What's wrong?

Originally posted by @andy3336 in #14 (comment)

@evanatherton evanatherton added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 28, 2020
@evanatherton
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @andy3336, that's a known limitation of the ABB RAPID post-processor as RAPID itself is not time-based.

If you want to use Mimic with an ABB and have the timing match Maya's timing, you need to create your own driver on the robot controller side (for example, using EGM).

It might be worth reaching out to ABB to see if they can offer guidance

If you already have a time-based driver, then we can easily write a post-processor that formats the data in whatever way you need (like a CSV, etc)

@andy3336
Copy link

Thanks very much

I will try according to your method

@jarpekar
Copy link

jarpekar commented Nov 27, 2020

Hi in ABB robots there is natively -T parameter , its very rarely used and not many people iven know that . Developeres from Sweeden told me some bugs in motion planners aswel. This time parameter override speed acc and calculate trajectory based on time. Means that from point other point it will take exaclty time you set. Maybe there is solution that you can generate time paths between points and onle set them in generated code. .... hope it willhelp .)

@Ardibid
Copy link

Ardibid commented Aug 26, 2021

I will probably test this feature next week and report on that!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants