Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using results of error estimation #601

Open
jcaccavo opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Using results of error estimation #601

jcaccavo opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@jcaccavo
Copy link

We would like to compare two different sets of genotype likelihoods (GLs) - one from a set of poor quality, degraded samples, and one from a set of better quality samples. We thought that we could use the error estimation feature in ANGSD as a metric to compare the two GL sets. We were thinking of using the Kim 2011 method (from polymoprhic sites), but would also consider using an error free individual (we have some samples in the better quality sample set with >15x coverage that could be used for this purpose).

Does anyone have any experience presenting this kind of analysis or using the error estimation feature for this purpose? I dug around in the literature and couldn't find any papers in which the error estimation was presented (and looking up papers citing Kim 2011 mostly talk about using GLs generally, not error estimation specifically).

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant