New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anaphora resolution #21
Comments
It looks like anaphora resolution would be a subproblem of the |
Go ahead and send a pull request with some data :) |
Here is an example from the biennial challenge http://www.cs.nyu.edu/faculty/davise/papers/WinogradSchemas/PDPChallenge2016.xml I'm not sure where to find the results of this challenge, but it is being run periodically. |
The organization of public competitions in this area is at http://commonsensereasoning.org/disambiguation.html and I'm not sure where the precise results have ended up. |
I recently learned about Winograd Schemas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winograd_Schema_Challenge
which are an approach to formalizing the testing of anaphora resolution (figuring out what a pronoun refers to when this can only be done from context and knowledge about the world). For example, in the pair of sentences
the word
she
in the first sentence refers tothe patient
, but in the second sentence tothe doctor
, because feeling ill is a reason for someone to be examined by a doctor, while medical expertise is a reason for someone to examine a patient. Or in a somewhat similar vein(In one case,
they [are/are not] vegetarian
refers to people, and in the other case to food items. For the Winograd schema case we would probably just say "Mahayana Buddhist monks may not eat carne asada burritos because they [are/are not] vegetarian", where then the wordthey
will refer either to people or to food items.)This is a remarkably difficult natural language processing problem because particular instances of it can test arbitrary knowledge about the world and the ability to make likely inferences about relationships, institutions, abilities, and motivations.
In Winograd schemas, a single change in a sentence flips the most natural resolution of a pronoun to refer to a different entity, and the question is to figure out which entity is referred to by each version of the sentence.
The Wikipedia article shows that there are several attempts to test how well different AIs and natural language processing systems can solve Winograd schema problems. Are any tests of this kind already included in any of the reading comprehension tasks? If not, they probably should be!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: