Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 25, 2020. It is now read-only.

Get clear about intake to know whether Federalist will be sustainable for GSA privacy #20

Open
2 of 3 tasks
nikzei opened this issue Feb 18, 2020 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks
Assignees

Comments

@nikzei
Copy link

nikzei commented Feb 18, 2020

We've been focused on getting the front end right; this is re: getting the backend right: let's get clearer about how data will come in, whether we can keep a simple and sustainable process for our partners while relying on Federalist.

[AC]
Test whether Federalist + google script works for partners.

  • have script/questions ready
    • Is GSA privacy ok with a google spreadsheet?
    • If they find a typo, they'll be ok updating it in the spreadsheet
    • Ok with adding new data into spreadsheet
    • ok with a five minute delay?
    • anything else
  • outcomes from test help us answer this question
  • engineering folks to make final call with next steps for backend build

(for scale w/ agencies that don't use google, we'd have to build it out, prob)

@nikzei nikzei created this issue from a note in Phase three work (To do) Feb 18, 2020
@ondrae
Copy link
Collaborator

ondrae commented Feb 19, 2020

I've got a rough plan:

  • We have a spreadsheet of data that is shared with our partners.
  • They can make changes to it as they want.
  • They can even create a google form that enters data into the spreadsheet as a new row.
  • We have a google script that runs whenever a change is made.
  • This google script saves the data of the sheet as a csv.
  • This google script commits the csv to our privacy-dashboard repo.
  • In a few minutes that new data from the spreadsheet shows up on the production website.

@ondrae
Copy link
Collaborator

ondrae commented Feb 19, 2020

I talked about the source of the idea above with reference links at https://gsa-tts.slack.com/archives/CNT2MQF7V/p1582062720148000

@nikzei
Copy link
Author

nikzei commented Feb 24, 2020

Maybe save for week two, sprint 3.

@ondrae ondrae assigned ondrae, nikzei and peterrowland and unassigned ondrae and nikzei Mar 2, 2020
@peterrowland
Copy link
Member

@nikzei nikzei moved this from To do to In progress in Phase three work Mar 4, 2020
@peterrowland peterrowland moved this from In progress to Done in Phase three work Mar 6, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants