[EPIC] As a site visitor, I'd like Guides information to be accurate

[christophermather]

A description of the work

There are some inaccuracies and inconsistencies that have been flagged across the guides.

We should review and correct these items to ensure that the information on the site is accurate.

See below task list for issues that have been flagged.

Point of contact on this issue

No response

Reproduction steps (if necessary)

No response

Skills Needed

• Any Human
• Design
• Content
• Engineering
• Acquisition
• Product
• Other

Does this need to happen in the next 2 weeks?

• Yes
• No

How much time do you anticipate this work taking?

No response

Acceptance Criteria

• Issues have been reviewed
• Inaccuracies have been identified and addressed

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. 🟢 Update UX Guide Resource page with current links #291
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
   
2. 🟡 Include co-design approaches and resources in the UX guide #293
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
3. 🟢 Clean up resource permalinks in UX Guide #309
   0 of 3
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
4. 🟢 Review agile position descriptions for content updates #313
   De-risking Guides Initiative 2 +3
5. 🟡 Federal Field guide mentions "your state's simplified procurement threshold" #314
   De-risking Guides Initiative 2 needs refinement +4
6. 🟢 Federal guide PDF has wrong intro sentence for Deciding What to Buy #315
   De-risking Guides Initiative 2 +3
   
7. Broken link on 18F Accessibility Checklist page #316
   Accessibility Guides Initiative 2 +3
   
8. 🟢 Recommending npm install --ignore-scripts might provide a false sense of security #320
   Engineering Guides Initiative 2 enhancement +4
9. Clarification of "time required" values #394
   Content Guides Initiative 2 Methods +4
   
10. 🟡 Review guide for broken/out-of-date links #252
    Guides Initiative 2 Product needs refinement +4