[EPIC] Review old UX Guide issues

[christophermather]

We have a number of old issues that have recently been pulled over from the old UX guide repo.

We need to review them and decide:

1. If they are still relevant and should be refined + prioritized
2. Or if they are no longer relevant and should be closed

Recommended steps:

• UX Guide code owner (@juliaklindpaintner) takes a pass on the issues
• UX code owner makes quick decisions
• Adds a 🟢, 🟡 or 🔴 to the issue in the Title field

🟢 means yes, this is still relevant
🔴 means no, this is no longer relevant
🟡 means needs more information/time to make a decision

Following these quick decisions, we should do a few follow-on steps, including: close out all 🔴s, pull all 🟢s and 🟡s into the TLC project backlog and tag all 🟡s with needs refinement.

Note: since there are so many issues, I chopped them up into three types... issues that needs shaping (ie don't have a lot of detail), needs decision (might be in better shape), and ready to go (seem valuable and well scoped).

Needs shaping

Beta Give feedback

1. 🟢 Clean up resource permalinks in UX Guide #309
   0 of 3
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
2. 🔴 New Design research Ethics content in the UX Guide #308
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
   
3. Create guidance on recruiting and researching with people with disabilities #304
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
   
4. 🟢 Review how we talk about remote practices across all guides to make sure content is not outdated #302
   0 of 4
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
5. 🔴 Set up milestone syncing #297
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
   
6. 🟡 Add PRA guidance to the UX Guide #296
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
7. 🟢 Add touchpoints as a recruitment tool #310
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
8. 🟡 Include co-design approaches and resources in the UX guide #293
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
9. 🔴 Document UX Guide site architecture in wiki #292
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
10. Addresses how we account for neurodiversity in our research practices #290
    Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
    
11. Create a method for Archetypes on the 18F Methods site #289
    Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
12. 🟡 Linking content to the TTS Handbook #288
    Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
13. 🟡 Document in the UX Guide and Method cards how DEIA informs our work #287
    Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
    
14. 🔴 Making content consistent in the ux guide #285
    Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
    
15. 🟢 Create meta descriptions for the UX Guide pages #284
    4 of 4
    Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
    
16. 🟡 New landing page designed for the 18F UX Guide #283
    Guides Initiative 2 UX enhancement +4
17. 🟡 As a visitor, I want to be able to print a pdf of the whole guide #281
    Guides Initiative 2 UX enhancement +4
    
18. 🟡 As a visitor, I can recognize where I am in relation to the whole page #282
    Guides Initiative 2 UX enhancement +4
19. 🟡 Better approach to adding a class to some ul tags #279
    Guides Initiative 2 UX enhancement question +5
20. 🟡 As a user, I need a quick way to navigate to other pages from deep within a page so that I don't become frustrated (small screens) #280
    Guides Initiative 2 UX enhancement +4
    

Needs decision

Beta Give feedback

1. 🟡 Part 2 - UX Guide - update language on working with partners #299
   Guides Initiative 2 UX needs refinement +4
2. 🟢 htmlproofer build process fails for non-existent link #305
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
3. 🟡 Outline product design goals for research practices Part 2 #306
   Guides Initiative 2 UX needs refinement +4
4. 🟢 Describe rationale for participant sample size in our work #307
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
   

Ready to go?

Beta Give feedback

1. 🟢 Update UX Guide Resource page with current links #291
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
   
2. 🟡 Create blog post based on communities content #295
   Guides Initiative 2 UX needs refinement +4
3. 🟢 Define research to understand how DEIA informs our work #300
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
4. 🟡 Draft content for diagramming/modeling practices #303
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3
5. Update the UX Guide title #465
   Guides Initiative 2 UX +3

[juliaklindpaintner]

Reviewed all open issues and added 🟡🟢🔴 ahead of the titles. I closed any that I labeled as 🔴.

[juliaklindpaintner]

@bpdesigns I wanted to draw your attention to this issue for UX Guide issues — this is where I probably should have caught that meta descriptions already existed, so I wonder if there is other stuff that you would characterize differently... Take a look at your leisure. I don't think there's any rush.

[bpdesigns]

Thanks @juliaklindpaintner I'll review these to see if they are still relevant.