-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feature] Multiple suppliers per connector/cable? #302
Comments
I've not yet seen any suggestion describing how such multiple manufacturers and suppliers could be listed in the BOM. How is this done in other systems or documents? |
We are currently using a semi-automated BOM based on protected Word document with VBA code to handle addition/removal of the parts as well as their distribution to procedure documents. Given such limited non-database platform we decided that implementing arbitrarily long list of suppliers for a given part is not realistic and opted for two fixed fields, Vendor1 and Vendor2, which gives us the ability to specify at least one alternative supplier. Not the prettiest solution, but it is better than having no alternative suppliers at all. As far as alternative manufacturers are concerned, we have not implemented that yet as there was no pressing need. But in principle it could be done in form of fixed fields too, basically Factory1, Factory1.Vendor1, Factory1.Vendor2, Factory2, Factory2.Vendor1, Factory2.Vendor2. Not pretty, but better than nothing. A true arbitrary length list of vendors would require a database (of any form, including YAML) and rendering in tabular form will never be great, as these multiple values will need to be crammed into the same column, but such is life. I think the rendering sample that you have provided above is the best I have seen so far. |
Is there a way to specify multiple suppliers for the same connector/cable? I tried to specify more than one pair of supplier/spn keys, but all it does is simply overrides all previous pair values and just uses the last pair specified.
What I mean is this:
Any other syntax that achieves the same would be fine too.
This feature is often needed in production environments, as it is typical to maintain several suppliers for the same part to ensure the ability to purchase from alternative sources if there are stocking issues with the primary supplier.
P.S. As a matter of fact, sometimes it is also needed to maintain multiple manufacturers and mpn's of functionally equivalent versions of the same component, with each such equivalent possibly having its own multiple suppliers. So, the code would look something like this:
Notice supplier/spn pairs have now become subordinate to their corresponding manufacturer/mpn pairs.
Perhaps having two pairs as a root for subordinate pairs is against YAML rules, so maybe this syntax would be more systematic:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: