[Bug]: max_context_len_to_capture
deprecated, confusion with max_seq_len_to_capture
#4911
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Your current environment
PyTorch version: N/A
Is debug build: N/A
CUDA used to build PyTorch: N/A
ROCM used to build PyTorch: N/A
OS: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS (x86_64)
GCC version: (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0
Clang version: Could not collect
CMake version: version 3.22.1
Libc version: glibc-2.35
Python version: 3.12.2 | packaged by Anaconda, Inc. | (main, Feb 27 2024, 17:35:02) [GCC 11.2.0] (64-bit runtime)
Python platform: Linux-5.15.0-1063-azure-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
Is CUDA available: N/A
CUDA runtime version: 12.4.131
CUDA_MODULE_LOADING set to: N/A
GPU models and configuration:
GPU 0: NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe
GPU 1: NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe
Nvidia driver version: 535.161.08
cuDNN version: Could not collect
HIP runtime version: N/A
MIOpen runtime version: N/A
Is XNNPACK available: N/A
CPU:
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Address sizes: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 48
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-47
Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
Model name: AMD EPYC 7V13 64-Core Processor
CPU family: 25
Model: 1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 48
Socket(s): 1
Stepping: 1
BogoMIPS: 4890.88
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscal
l nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma
cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm cmp_legacy cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch os
vw topoext perfctr_core invpcid_single vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec
xgetbv1 xsaves clzero xsaveerptr rdpru arat umip vaes vpclmulqdq rdpid fsrm
Hypervisor vendor: Microsoft
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 1.5 MiB (48 instances)
L1i cache: 1.5 MiB (48 instances)
L2 cache: 24 MiB (48 instances)
L3 cache: 192 MiB (6 instances)
NUMA node(s): 2
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-23
NUMA node1 CPU(s): 24-47
Vulnerability Gather data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Not affected
Vulnerability Retbleed: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec rstack overflow: Mitigation; safe RET, no microcode
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines; STIBP disabled; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected; BHI Not affected
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Versions of relevant libraries:
[pip3] No relevant packages
[conda] No relevant packagesROCM Version: Could not collect
Neuron SDK Version: N/A
vLLM Version: N/A
vLLM Build Flags:
CUDA Archs: Not Set; ROCm: Disabled; Neuron: Disabled
GPU Topology:
GPU0 GPU1 NIC0 CPU Affinity NUMA Affinity GPU NUMA ID
GPU0 X NV12 NODE 0-23 0 N/A
GPU1 NV12 X SYS 24-47 1 N/A
NIC0 NODE SYS X
Legend:
X = Self
SYS = Connection traversing PCIe as well as the SMP interconnect between NUMA nodes (e.g., QPI/UPI)
NODE = Connection traversing PCIe as well as the interconnect between PCIe Host Bridges within a NUMA node
PHB = Connection traversing PCIe as well as a PCIe Host Bridge (typically the CPU)
PXB = Connection traversing multiple PCIe bridges (without traversing the PCIe Host Bridge)
PIX = Connection traversing at most a single PCIe bridge
NV# = Connection traversing a bonded set of # NVLinks
NIC Legend:
NIC0: mlx5_an0
🐛 Describe the bug
Hello,
I encountered an issue while using
max_context_len_to_capture
. I received the following error message:I switched to using
max_seq_len_to_capture
, but I discovered that the correct parameter is actuallymax-seq_len-to-capture
(with an underscore in the middle).Could you please clarify if this is intentional or if it might be a typo? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: