Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend PebblesDB to use SURF filters #17

Open
vijay03 opened this issue Nov 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Extend PebblesDB to use SURF filters #17

vijay03 opened this issue Nov 22, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@vijay03
Copy link
Member

vijay03 commented Nov 22, 2018

PebblesDB currently uses bloom filters. Change PebblesDB so that it uses SURF Filters from CMU (https://github.com/efficient/SuRF) instead. This should help both point-query and range query performance.

@malavdesai16
Copy link

malavdesai16 commented Nov 16, 2020

Hello Sir,
It was noted in the paper that using Bloom filters is PebblesDB leads to high consumption of memory compared to HyperLevelDB. I read an interesting paper on Vacuum Filters. Is it feasible to extend PebblesDB with Vacuum Filters? Although, it wont help point-query and range query performance but it will help with minimizing the space consumption.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants