Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As open as possible and as closed as necessary - revisited #3

Open
gorana011 opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

As open as possible and as closed as necessary - revisited #3

gorana011 opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@gorana011
Copy link

The spirit of OS is to reduce obstacles to knowledge, data and tools in an attempt to speed up scientific discovery and promote scientific accountability and collaboration. Whilst we all subscribe and aspire to adhere to these worthy goals, the reality is that not all science is, or should be made open. Increasingly, neuroscience research is funded by industry, commercial companies and governmental bodies. The issues around “openness” arise when Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are involved or when the research study and its findings involve potentially classified data. In this session, we will discuss some obstacles to OS when working with industry and governmental agencies, from different cultural perspectives. We will share our experiences, propose various solutions (e.g. hybrid OS-IP models), and open a discussion about safe research practices in neuroscience for future adoption of OS in a commercial world.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant