Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any plans to support ICP and its derived scores? #936

Open
crazydogen opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Any plans to support ICP and its derived scores? #936

crazydogen opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@crazydogen
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like
Sixty years have passed since neurosurgeon Nils Lundberg presented his thesis about intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, which represents a milestone for its clinical introduction. Monitoring of ICP has since become a clinical routine worldwide, and today represents a cornerstone in surveillance of patients with acute brain injury or disease, and a diagnostic of individuals with chronic neurological disease.

Evensen, K.B., Eide, P.K. Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement. Fluids Barriers CNS 17, 34 (2020).

ICP monitoring involves some indexes or scores such as AMP/RAP/PRX/CPP/CPPOpt/IAAC.

CPP derived scores

How could we do it?
To support these ICP derived scores, peak detection (that NeuroKit already supports ) and moving pearson's coefficient (not that hard) should be implemented.

Here is implementing example (PRx/CPP/CPPOpt).

Copy link

welcome bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi 👋 Thanks for reaching out and opening your first issue here! We'll try to come back to you as soon as possible. ❤️ kenobi

@crazydogen crazydogen changed the title Any plan to support ICP and its derived scores? Any plans to support ICP and its derived scores? Dec 4, 2023
@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

@crazydogen thanks for letting me know about this, as I'm quite unfamiliar with ICP. I would say it is currently out of scope to add full and bespoke support, as NK mostly focuses on non-invasive physiological signals that are acquired for research purposes in psychology/neuroscience, rather than in clinical contexts.

That said, as you mentioned, some of its tools can likely be used to perhaps create an ICP-monitoring-focused add-on package

@crazydogen
Copy link
Author

Okay, someone could be interested in it and put it into action.

Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 17, 2024

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants