Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: Chrome X-Pack UI Functional Tests with ES SSL - Triggers Actions UI.x-pack/test/functional_with_es_ssl/apps/triggers_actions_ui/rules_list/rules_list·ts - Actions and Triggers app Rules list rules list should disable single alert #157623

Open
kibanamachine opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 8 comments · Fixed by #183805
Assignees
Labels
blocker failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test skipped-test Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) v8.15.0

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented May 12, 2023

A test failed on a tracked branch

Error: expected 200 "OK", got 400 "Bad Request"
    at Test._assertStatus (node_modules/supertest/lib/test.js:268:12)
    at Test._assertFunction (node_modules/supertest/lib/test.js:283:11)
    at Test.assert (node_modules/supertest/lib/test.js:173:18)
    at localAssert (node_modules/supertest/lib/test.js:131:12)
    at /home/buildkite-agent/builds/kb-n2-4-spot-d5912f55fdebcdfd/elastic/kibana-on-merge/kibana/node_modules/supertest/lib/test.js:128:5
    at Test.Request.callback (node_modules/superagent/lib/node/index.js:728:3)
    at /home/buildkite-agent/builds/kb-n2-4-spot-d5912f55fdebcdfd/elastic/kibana-on-merge/kibana/node_modules/superagent/lib/node/index.js:916:18
    at IncomingMessage.<anonymous> (node_modules/superagent/lib/node/parsers/json.js:19:7)
    at IncomingMessage.emit (node:events:525:35)
    at endReadableNT (node:internal/streams/readable:1358:12)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:83:21)

First failure: CI Build - 8.8

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label May 12, 2023
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label May 12, 2023
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) label May 12, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/response-ops (Team:ResponseOps)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label May 12, 2023
@jcger jcger closed this as completed May 17, 2023
@kibanamachine kibanamachine reopened this Mar 14, 2024
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@mistic
Copy link
Member

mistic commented Mar 22, 2024

Skipped.

main: cf918f8

@umbopepato umbopepato self-assigned this Apr 23, 2024
@cnasikas cnasikas added v8.15.0 and removed v8.14.0 labels May 15, 2024
umbopepato added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
…g test flakyness (#183805)

## Summary

Removes optimistic updates from rules list item when enabling/disabling
rules to avoid out-of-sync states (the likely cause of
[this](#157623) flaky test).

Fixes #157623
@kibanamachine kibanamachine reopened this May 23, 2024
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: kibana-on-merge - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: kibana-on-merge - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: kibana-on-merge - main

mistic added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2024
@mistic mistic added the blocker label May 30, 2024
@mistic
Copy link
Member

mistic commented May 30, 2024

Skipped.

main: 1c5e977

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocker failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test skipped-test Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) v8.15.0
Projects
None yet
6 participants