Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xWebAppPoolDefaults missing bunch of settings #105

Closed
artisticcheese opened this issue Mar 30, 2016 · 8 comments · May be fixed by #324
Closed

xWebAppPoolDefaults missing bunch of settings #105

artisticcheese opened this issue Mar 30, 2016 · 8 comments · May be fixed by #324
Labels
enhancement The issue is an enhancement request. in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone.

Comments

@artisticcheese
Copy link

Is it expected or I'm missing something. Total number of parameters shall be the same as xWebAppPool since those are inherited for any knewly created apppool.

@tysonjhayes
Copy link

What version of the module are you using? 1.8.0.0 added a bunch of parameters, if there are still more that are missing could you point out which ones you feel should be there?

@artisticcheese
Copy link
Author

Version 1.9.0.0

All application pool settings are missing. Every single one of them. Below are the only one available.

xWebAppPoolDefaults [String] #ResourceName
{
ApplyTo = [string]{ Machine }
[DependsOn = [string[]]]
[IdentityType = [string]{ ApplicationPoolIdentity | LocalService | LocalSystem | NetworkService }]
[ManagedRuntimeVersion = [string]{ | v2.0 | v4.0 }]
[PsDscRunAsCredential = [PSCredential]]
}

@tysonjhayes
Copy link

Sorry that was my bad, I misread the resource name.

Yes it's expected at this time, though we are open to PRs on improving this!

@artisticcheese
Copy link
Author

Every application pool setting from xWebAppPool shall be part of this setting. So please consider adding them. Those values are inherited when new pools are created.

@artisticcheese
Copy link
Author

Also what property ApplyTo does for xWebAppDefaults?

@onurbiyik
Copy link

onurbiyik commented Mar 23, 2018

@artisticcheese, Now that this issue is closed, Is this feature not going to be implemented at all? or is there a different approach?

@artisticcheese
Copy link
Author

Nobody worked on it for last 2 years, what's the point of having it open? Hence I closed it.

@johlju
Copy link
Member

johlju commented Apr 23, 2018

@onurbiyik @artisticcheese Reopening this issue since there are PR that has been proposed for this.

@johlju johlju reopened this Apr 23, 2018
@johlju johlju added the in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone. label Apr 23, 2018
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT added this to In progress in powershell/dscresources May 14, 2019
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT removed this from In progress in powershell/dscresources Nov 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement The issue is an enhancement request. in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants