Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest minor change to top level menus (related to issue #93) #200

Open
2 of 4 tasks
VisLab opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

Suggest minor change to top level menus (related to issue #93) #200

VisLab opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@VisLab
Copy link
Member

VisLab commented Sep 10, 2021

(related to #93 )

Here are some suggestions for minor changes to top level menus:

ABOUT
NEWS
BENEFITS
SPECIFICATION
GET STARTED
GET INVOLVED
SOFTWARE
GOVERNANCE
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

  • Here THE SPECIFICATION becomes SPECIFICATION to make it shorter.

  • GETTING STARTED becomes GET STARTED to make shorter and parallel to GET INVOLVED.

  • SOFTWARE (or maybe TOOLS?) is added because right now a list of SOFTWARE using BIDS is under the BENEFITS page which is not where I would look. Having its own menu item promotes software and/or tools, which most BIDS users are going to be particularly interested in.

  • Also, could the GET_INVOLVED page benefit from the addition of a brief statement about how to get tools listed or contributing BIDS apps?

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Member

Thanks @VisLab I like your suggestions, and I think especially the first two ones could be implemented without a lot discussion (but all others who read this: let me know if you disagree). I opened #201 for that.

Regarding the remaining points:

  • Software section
  • Improving Get Involved

I agree with both your suggestions, but will leave implementation / concrete text suggestions to others.

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with getting getting the tool lists out of BENEFITS. I also think that the page should be called SOFTWARES: although maybe less accurate technically than TOOLS, I think people will understand it better.

@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Collaborator

I like the proposed change. I am only worried whether such a long list of top-level menu items will show correctly, or whether it gets too wide. The only way to find that out is to try.

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Contributor

Tempted to actually have the content of the SPECIFICATION page moved into the GET STARTED one.

Other possibility: put their content into the header of the website so it is always accessible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants