You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The second section of the guide is "References", which is a prescription to use "const" over "var". This section showcases a "bad" code example and a "good" code example. So far, so good.
The first section of the guide is "Types", which, as far as I can tell, doesn't offer any prescriptions at all. It is simply educating the reader on the how variables work in the JavaScript programming language. Furthermore, the section does not show any "bad" code examples or "good" code examples.
Is there a particular reason that this section is included in the style guide? It seems notably out of place - every other section seems to impart a specific coding prescription. There is a time and a place to teach JavaScript newbies the basics on how the language works, and it doesn't seem like it should be in a style guide.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Greetings,
The second section of the guide is "References", which is a prescription to use "const" over "var". This section showcases a "bad" code example and a "good" code example. So far, so good.
The first section of the guide is "Types", which, as far as I can tell, doesn't offer any prescriptions at all. It is simply educating the reader on the how variables work in the JavaScript programming language. Furthermore, the section does not show any "bad" code examples or "good" code examples.
Is there a particular reason that this section is included in the style guide? It seems notably out of place - every other section seems to impart a specific coding prescription. There is a time and a place to teach JavaScript newbies the basics on how the language works, and it doesn't seem like it should be in a style guide.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: