Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to ArcGIS REST JS 4.x #945

Open
yannikmesserli opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Migrate to ArcGIS REST JS 4.x #945

yannikmesserli opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@yannikmesserli
Copy link

yannikmesserli commented Dec 16, 2022

Urban is using @esri/hub-discussions and a few packages from the ArcGIS REST JS. However, @esri/hub-discussions is pinning the version of the rest packages to 3.x. As this is several months outdated, @esri/hug.js should move to the 4.x packages.

There are a few breaking changes but it should not be a huge amount of work to migrate

@brollison
Copy link

@dbouwman ☝🏻

@dbouwman
Copy link
Member

@yannikmesserli We are planning to migrate hub.js this year... ideally during before Q3 but we will see. While upgrading hub.js itself is not a tremendous lift, Hub as a whole has many packages, which all depend on rest-js 3.x, so we have to structure the upgrade in a manageable way.

The plan is to start with hub.js, and release that on a -alpha or -next tag - would that work for you?

@lisastaehli
Copy link

@dbouwman following up on this briefly :) do you have an update on your migration plans? Thanks for a quick update when you get to it.

Using an -alpha or -next tag would work for us - given that if it does not impact the functionality we are using in Urban of course.

@brollison
Copy link

@dbouwman can you create a 0_TECH issue in the dc/hub repo in Devtopia so that we can monitor priority of resolution. Once you have an issue, please link cross-link the issues if possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants